Legal X
  • Welcome to Legal X
  • Contract Address
  • KYC Verified - Assure Defi
  • Audit Passed - Assure Defi
  • Ledger Affiliate
  • Legal X Merchandise
  • Why Legal X?
    • Legal X Network
    • Legal X Approach
    • Legal X Ecosystem
      • Legal X Litigate
      • Legal X LegalFI
      • Legal X Exchange
      • Legal X Gaming
      • Legal X Launch Pad
      • Legal X Non-Profit
      • Legal X Know Your Customer (KYC)
      • Legal X Finance
      • Legal X Revenue Share Bots
    • Legal X Partnership Hub
      • Assure Defi
      • Neiman Marcus
      • Synchrony Bank
      • Capital One
      • PayBitoPro
      • BitStorage
      • Dex Trade
    • Legal X Roadmap
    • Dashboard Explained
  • Usecases
    • #1 - Scott Been vs John Bunszel
  • LEGAL Token
    • Tokenomics
      • Reflections Explained
    • $LEGAL Token Burns
  • Legal X Media
    • Introducing Detective X and Bot X
      • Detective X
      • Bot X
  • Community Hub
    • Legal X FAQ
  • Social Links
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • ⚖️ Overview
  • 👤 Plaintiff
  • 🎯 Defendant
  • 📜 The Scheme
  • 🚨 The Allegations
  • 💥 Damages Sought
  • 🧾 What This Means
  • 📂 Full Petition (PDF)
  1. Usecases

#1 - Scott Been vs John Bunszel

Legal X Lawsuit Exposes NFT Scam - Filed May 12th, 2025 — Montgomery County, Texas

PreviousDashboard ExplainedNextTokenomics

Last updated 6 days ago

⚖️ Overview

On May 12th, 2025, Scott Been officially filed a lawsuit in Montgomery County, Texas, against John Bunszel, accusing him of fraud, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and conspiracy. This legal filing targets a fraudulent NFT scheme that promised monthly token rewards, but delivered none.


👤 Plaintiff

Scott Been 📍 Porter, TX Filed via: Montgomery County Court at Law #6 Attorney: Javier Martinez


🎯 Defendant

John Bunszel 📍 Hanson, Massachusetts Accused of operating a deceptive NFT project and partnering with a known fraudster.


📜 The Scheme

In June 2022:

  • Plaintiff purchased an NFT from the Defendant for $5,000.

  • Agreement promised a monthly 2.5% token reward (Carbon Tokens).

  • No tokens were ever delivered.

  • Subsequent investigations revealed the NFT was part of a larger scam involving Defendant’s partner, Alfonso Knoll.


🚨 The Allegations

1. Breach of Contract

Defendant failed to deliver rewards as outlined in the agreement.

2. Unjust Enrichment

Defendant profited while Plaintiff lost $5,000 with zero return.

3. Fraud

Misleading promises were knowingly made to induce investment.

4. Conspiracy to Commit Fraud

The Defendant and his partner are alleged to have coordinated multiple scams.

5. DTPA Violations

Defendant violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act by concealing material facts and misrepresenting benefits.


💥 Damages Sought

  • Monetary Relief: Over $20,000

  • Treble Damages: As allowed under DTPA

  • Attorney Fees

  • Exemplary/Punitive Damages


🧾 What This Means

This case highlights a real-world consequence of deceptive NFT projects. Investors are encouraged to remain vigilant and always research deeply before committing funds, especially when rewards seem too good to be true.


📂 Full Petition (PDF)

Click here to read the full filed lawsuit

167KB
Original Petition - Been v Bunszel.docx (3).pdf
pdf
Legal X Lawsuit Exposes NFT Scam