### βοΈ Overview
On May 12th, 2025, Scott Been officially filed a lawsuit in Montgomery County, Texas, against John Bunszel, accusing him of fraud, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and conspiracy. This legal filing targets a fraudulent NFT scheme that promised monthly token rewards, but delivered none.
***
### π€ Plaintiff
**Scott Been**\
π Porter, TX\
Filed via: *Montgomery County Court at Law #6*\
Attorney: *Javier Martinez*
***
### π― Defendant
**John Bunszel**\
π Hanson, Massachusetts\
Accused of operating a deceptive NFT project and partnering with a known fraudster.
***
### π The Scheme
In June 2022:
* Plaintiff purchased an NFT from the Defendant for **$5,000**.
* Agreement promised a **monthly 2.5% token reward** (Carbon Tokens).
* No tokens were ever delivered.
* Subsequent investigations revealed the NFT was part of a **larger scam** involving Defendantβs partner, **Alfonso Knoll**.
***
### π¨ The Allegations
#### 1. Breach of Contract
Defendant failed to deliver rewards as outlined in the agreement.
#### 2. Unjust Enrichment
Defendant profited while Plaintiff lost $5,000 with zero return.
#### 3. Fraud
Misleading promises were knowingly made to induce investment.
#### 4. Conspiracy to Commit Fraud
The Defendant and his partner are alleged to have coordinated multiple scams.
#### 5. DTPA Violations
Defendant violated the **Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act** by concealing material facts and misrepresenting benefits.
***
### π₯ Damages Sought
* **Monetary Relief**: Over $20,000
* **Treble Damages**: As allowed under DTPA
* **Attorney Fees**
* **Exemplary/Punitive Damages**
***
### π§Ύ What This Means
This case highlights a real-world consequence of deceptive NFT projects. Investors are encouraged to remain vigilant and always research deeply before committing funds, especially when rewards seem too good to be true.
***
### π Full Petition (PDF)
Click here to read the full filed lawsuit
{% file src="/files/6YYOKYypN4BLZeWUY0hn" %}
***
---
# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.
Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:
```
GET https://legal-x.gitbook.io/legal-x/usecases/1-scott-been-vs-john-bunszel.md?ask=
```
The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.
Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.